Earth Share of Washington

Short Session, Big Wins: 2008 in Olympia

Numerous Earth Share of Washington organizations were active in the short 2008 legislative session, addressing a broad range of environmental issues from local solutions to global warming to promoting sustainable transportation to protecting children from toxics in toys and other products. Here is a summary of just a few success stories this session:

Washington Toxics Coalition - Children's Safe Product Act
After the Senate's 40 to 9 approval of the Children's Safe Product Act on March 7th, the House concurred a few days later with a vote of 92 to 2. At press time, the bill was on the Governor's desk awaiting signature.

"This is a significant victory that will protect children from dangerous chemicals in toys and other products," said Ivy Sager-Rosenthal, Environmental Health Advocate for Washington Toxics Coalition. "This bill is the strongest in the nation and will serve as a model for others to follow."

The bill received critical support from doctors, nurses, and other health professionals, especially in the final days leading up to its passage. The final bill includes the following:

• The strongest lead, cadmium, and phthalates standards for children's products in the nation.
• Requirements for state agencies to identify other chemicals potentially present in toys and other children's products that could harm children's health.
• Critical right-to-know provisions that will provide consumers information on toxic chemical content of toys and other products.

Transportation Choices Coalition - Promoting Sustainable Transportation
Transportation Choices Coalition convened a group of progressive transportation interests with the goal of combining resources behind a short list of legislative priorities for 2008 and a powerful lobby day to capitalize on their political strength. They arrived at five top-priority issues for the 2008 session. Check out their successes:

• Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): Tools for a Sustainable Future - As part of the governor's Climate Advisory Team process, decreasing VMT was a "most promising" strategy at reducing greenhouse gas emission and easing congestions on our freeways. The Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled proposal in HB 2815 will: Set initial state benchmarks to reduce per capita VMT, giving regions tools to succeed and launch a collaborative process to clearly identify key strategies to achieve VMT reduction.
• Transportation Education for Kids & The Matthew Tatsuo Nakata Act - Our local neighborhoods and communities thrive when we all have the opportunity to get around in ways that are healthy and safe. Named for the Seattle City Council aide killed in November by a motorist while crossing a West Seattle street, the Matthew "Tatsuo" Nakata Act (HB 2564) was passed by the House 73 - 22, and the Senate 45 - 2. It would add pedestrian and bicycle safety to the basic minimum curriculum for driver training.
• Local Solutions to Global Warming - The choices made in local land use and zoning plans have a huge impact on global warming emissions. SB 6580, which was approved by the House 58 - 35, and the Senate 30 - 18, will establish a competitive grants program for local governments leading planning efforts; will provide tools and technology to achieve their goals of significant climate reductions; and will launch a stakeholder process to make recommendations for policy changes necessary for local governments to reduce their climate impacts.
• Tolling: Stronger Vision, Pro-Transit Policies - The legislature built a foundation for tolling policy in this year's HB 1773, which was approved by the House 60 - 33 and the Senate 29 - 19. The bill is consistent with our stated principles including:
  • The featured role of variable pricing to achieve reliable movement of people and goods
  • Authority to reinvest tolling revenues into transit service and capital, demand management, better transportation choices, and safety and maintenance in the corridor
  • Consideration of social equity, environmental, and economic issues, as well as making progress towards greenhouse gas reduction goals.

NW Energy Coalition - Boosting Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is the cleanest, cheapest and most abundant source of energy available. Recent studies suggest that energy efficient efforts can slash our global warming carbon emissions by half. And energy efficiency makes good fiscal sense, with potential utility bill savings for homeowners and local governments totaling millions of dollars. With this in mind, NW Energy Coalition and other clean energy advocates and environmentalists supported state legislation this year aimed at saving money and energy for Washington consumers and businesses, while cutting climate pollution.

Three pieces of energy efficiency legislation passed out of this year's legislature and have been signed by the Governor. The bills were a fraction of the total package of energy efficiency bills introduced, but are a step forward.

A big win for clean energy and low-income advocates, the passage of SHB 2847 provides sales and use tax exemptions for low-income weatherization materials and services used by community action agencies. The tax relief will encourage more weatherization of low-income residents' homes, cutting energy use, and lowering utility bills.

SHB 3120 requires the Washington State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development to conduct a study on tax incentives intended to encourage green building. The study will be presented to the legislature December 1, 2008. It's hoped that future legislation to encourage green buildings will emerge from this report.

Finally, the small business B&O tax credit, HB 3362, will help small businesses afford certain highly energy efficiency appliances, such as freezers, washing machines, and ovens.

Recent studies have shown that we can meet all new demand for electricity through 2018 with energy efficiency and renewable energy. To meet the Governor's climate goals, we must continue to meet all new demand with clean energy and will need to replace an estimated 7,000 megawatts of obsolete fossil fuel power plants in the region with renewables and energy efficiency. NW Energy Coalition will continue to support and encourage State policies that promote energy efficiency as a mechanism that reduces energy use, consumers' utility bills and climate-changing pollution.

To find out more about the 2008 legislative session, please visit the Priorities for a Healthy Washington website - www.environmentalpriorities.org

Posted in the April 2008 Earth Page

Seattle Named a 'Solar America City'

- Submitted by Earth Share organization Northwest SEED

One of 12 cities to receive the DOE Award for 2008

On March 31, Mayor Greg Nickels announced that the city of Seattle was named a "Solar America City" by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). As a result, Seattle will leverage a $200,000 DOE grant with $200,000 in local funds on a variety of efforts to promote the development of a sustainable solar energy infrastructure.

"Climate change is a very real threat to the future of our city and our planet," Nickels said. "We must expand our options for clean, renewable power. Developing solar energy as a reliable power source will do just that."

With this grant, Seattle will:
* establish strategies to increase the deployment of solar energy technology;
* incorporate both building and community-scale solar standards into planning processes; and
* develop and implement solar education and outreach programs.

Seattle's partners are Northwest Sustainable Energy for Economic Development (SEED), which works to establish a clean, diverse, and affordable Northwest energy system based on efficient use of renewable resources, with maximum local control and ownership of energy assets; and the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.

Posted in the April 2008 Earth Page

Can Saving a River Make a Difference for Climate Change?

- By Michael Mayer of Earth Share organization Washington Environmental Council (WEC)

Water and Climate Change. Two of the most pressing environmental issues of our time. Readers of The Earth Page know how important each is if we are going to protect and maintain a livable Washington for future generations. You know, for instance, that if climate change continues unchecked, it will alter the crops we can grow, reduce our winter snowpack, and damage our temperate forestlands. You also know that water is a limited resource throughout the state and that water scarcity is increasingly a dominant issue for people concerned about fish habitat, irrigated agriculture, or population growth.

Climate change in Washington will also undoubtedly further impact rivers and streams if temperatures continue to rise over the next century. This concern adds a layer of urgency to WEC’s efforts on water issues. Our rivers - already suffering from excessive water withdrawals - will only suffer additional stresses if we don’t turn the corner on climate change. But there are other less obvious ways in which the two issues align, and more importantly there are solutions that will help us make progress on both.

As awareness about climate change grows, people are becoming more sophisticated about their energy use. By now, most people understand the need to insulate homes, use compact florescent bulbs when possible, and drive cars less. But water use plays an important role in energy consumption too. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that around 8% percent of the nation’s energy use is employed just to pump, treat, and heat water.

If you live in a city, think about the water that comes out of your faucet or garden hose. It has likely been pumped out of the ground or a river, treated to meet drinking water standards, and piped to your home. Once it runs down the drain or into a sewer, it is pumped to a wastewater treatment facility, purified again, and pumped into the ocean or nearest river. Energy is consumed at each stage.

In addition, all of us use up even more energy to heat, cool, and use that water in our homes and businesses. According to the EPA, in most cities this is the greatest water-related energy cost. And the agency provides a telling example: running a hot water faucet for five minutes is equivalent to a 60-watt bulb burning for 14 hours.

In Washington, Seattle has been a pioneer in water conservation efforts. Over the past quarter century, the city has grown from just under 1 million water users to approximately 1.3 million. Yet instead of a 30% increase in water use, total usage is lower today than it was in 1975. This result has not occurred by accident. Due to the city’s ongoing investments in conservation efforts - including rebates for efficient appliances, changes to the plumbing code, and pricing designed to discourage waste - both residential and commercial water use has steadily dropped.

The progress made in Seattle shows us, we can do more. Being efficient and conserving water keeps more in our rivers, streams, and aquifers, lowers energy use, and can save homeowners and businesses money. It’s the smart thing to do, and we know how to do it.

For water conservation tips and updates on our Water for Washington and Climate Change campaigns, check the WEC website and sign up for our email GreenTree Action Network at www.wecprotects.org.

Posted in the February 2008 Earth Page

2008 Priorities for a Healthy Washington

- By Kerry McHugh of Earth Share organization Washington Environmental Council

Each year Washington's environmental community comes together to select four legislative Priorities for a Healthy Washington. By joining together, the groups that make up the Priorities collaborative are better able to advance ambitious goals in the legislature and make a difference for Washington’s land, air, and water.

This year’s Priorities encompass legislation to get our state on track to meet its goals for reducing global warming pollution, to make our communities denser and more climate-friendly, to protect and restore our urban forests, and to invigorate local farms while providing healthier food for kids.

The community is already hard at work - helping create coalitions, educate legislators, and engage environmental advocates to build support for the Priorities in the lead up to the 2008 legislative session which begins on January 14th.

Below is a look at the four Priorities for a Healthy Washington. If you’re interested in more in-depth coverage of a particular Priority go to http://www.environmentalpriorities.org to learn more.

Washington Climate Action
Earlier this year our state set goals to reduce global warming pollution. This Priority will create a structure and timeline for making these goals real. Taking action in 2008 is crucial to make progress on this important issue. Foot-dragging at the federal level is a problem, and we can take action at the state level to lead the nation toward solving this global challenge. Responsible limits on climate pollution will establish Washington as a strong leader in the clean energy economy, increase energy independence, create good new jobs, and deliver a better future for our children.

Local Solutions to Global Warming
About half of our state’s global warming pollution comes from transportation. We need to address this factor if we are to make significant headway. This Priority will help local governments make responsible plans about where we live, how we get around, and consider how those choices can reduce global warming pollution. With the dramatic population growth expected in our state, we must make responsible decisions - now - so we can reduce driving and promote efficient, livable communities.

Evergreen Cities
Since 1971, we have lost almost half of the urban forest land surrounding Puget Sound, which increases air pollution and stormwater flow, and costs the tax payers billions of dollars. Proper forest planning, management, and stewardship are necessary to reverse this trend. Keeping existing trees and planting new ones enhances quality of life for people, increases property values, gives us cleaner water and habitat for birds and wildlife, and will make Washington's cities evergreen.

Local Farms - Healthy Kids
This effort addresses two major challenges facing our state: concerns about the diet and health of our children and the well-being of our small and mid-sized farms. By connecting local kids with local food we get great Washington produce to schools and can improve children’s health. By creating vibrant demand for local food, we help stimulate local agriculture, which helps to keep working lands working.

Get Involved
There are many avenues if you are interested in helping pass these four Priorities -- two great opportunities are our annual Legislative Workshop (January 12th in Seattle) and then 2008 Lobby Day (January 23rd) where people from around the state come to Olympia to make their voices heard in the Capitol. For more information and to register, please go to Priorities for a Healthy Washington web site -- www.environmentalpriorities.org.

Posted in the January 2008 Earth Page

Northwest Solutions to Climate Change - Part 2 of 2 - Building the Clean Energy Economy

- Submitted by Patrick Mazza of Earth Share organization Climate Solutions

In this two-part series, we feature articles from two Earth Share of Washington organizations -- NW Energy Coalition and Climate Solutions -- offering potential solutions to the climate crisis. Last month’s article delved into some of the strategies to lower CO2 emissions, while part two outlines some specific legislation that makes up one of this year's Priorities for a Healthy Washington.

Climate Solutions readies a plan to reduce global warming pollution and build the clean energy economy

Climate Action legislation will be one of the environmental community’s four top priorities for the 2008 legislative session, and Earth Share of Washington organization Climate Solutions will take a leading role in developing clean energy solutions for Washington state.

The Washington Climate Action bill will put in place an implementation plan to meet global warming pollution reduction goals announced by Gov. Chris Gregoire and reaffirmed by the Legislature in 2007 (with passage of SB6001). Enacting a global warming pollution reduction plan will set priorities for Washington state and local public agencies as they make crucial decisions on transportation and energy. It will also create the legal groundwork for the state to take part in the carbon cap and trade system being negotiated among western states and allied jurisdictions in the Western Climate Initiative. In addition, a firm climate commitment by Washington, the second largest state in the Western U.S. with the West’s third largest metropolitan area, will send a powerful message to the nation – building support for enactment of strong climate legislation in the U.S. Congress.

A firm commitment to reducing global warming pollution is important for the Washington economy as well. It will send a strong signal that new markets are opening for low emissions technologies. This will draw investment and help build Washington’s budding clean technology sectors including energy efficiency, smart electric power grids and advanced bio-energy. Economic modeling of California’s binding cap enacted in 2006 finds that by driving new investments in efficiency and innovation, the cap could add up to 89,000 new jobs and $74 billion annually to the California economy by 2020. Clear limits on global warming pollution will drive similar economic benefits for Washington.

In fact, leadership in the clean technology economy is closely tied limiting global warming pollution. Around the world, the countries that have adopted strong limits on greenhouse gases are leading the way in transforming their economy. The two regions of the country that already have enacted caps, California and the Northeast, are drawing more than half the nation’s clean technology investments. Massachusetts, with a population slightly larger than Washington state, has garnered the largest share of Northeast clean tech venture funding.

Legendary Silicon Valley venture capitalist John Doerr, who helped Google and Intuit start up, notes, "Green technology is bigger than the Internet. It could be the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century." That is part of the reason he was one of the leading voices for passage of the California’s groundbreaking legislation limiting climate pollution. For him, transforming our fossil fuel economy to clean energy sources is not only a moral imperative: "It's good for the California economy." As new economy guru Thomas Freedman has noted, “In pushing our companies to go green we are spurring them to take the lead in the next great global industry -- clean power.”

Legally binding limits on global warming pollution will be good for the Washington economy, not to mention the planet and our children’s future. It will place Washington in the front rank of states working to cool down global warming, and help move the nation as a whole in that direction. Climate Solutions will be working to make sure legislation that puts our state in the lead on climate passes in the 2008 session.

To learn more about the Washington environmental community’s Priorities for a Healthy Washington, visit www.environmentalpriorities.org. Look for a comprehensive review of the top 4 2008 legislative priorities in the January 2008 edition of The Earth Page.

Posted in the December 2007 Earth Page

EarthCorps and eSurance hold first-ever Carbon Offset Day in Washington

- Submitted by Earth Share of Washington organization EarthCorps

On November 10, 2007, over 500 volunteers joined EarthCorps, eSurance and the State of Washington to celebrate the first ever Carbon Offset Day. Volunteers planted over 3,000 trees and plants at sites around the metro Seattle region and learned about other ways to reduce or offset their carbon emissions.

Plant a tree – Offset your carbon.
EarthCorps encouraged volunteers to take a direct, hands-on approach to offsetting their carbon emissions: by planting trees in parks, receiving education and resources to plant their own yards, and learning about other ways to reduce their carbon footprint.

Governor Christine Gregoire proclaimed November 10 statewide as Carbon Offset Day, noting that "community-based reforestation is an effective educational tool and strategy for offsetting atmospheric CO2, thereby contributing to slowing climate change, and EarthCorps brings together community members to restore and reforest our public lands."

Seattle City Council Member Richard Conlin joined in the planting at Frink Park, where he announced the new Seattle Public Utilities Climate Action Grant, which allows community groups working on projects near streams in Seattle parks to apply for a week of EarthCorps crew time to assist their project.

As an example of rethinking everyday actions and their impact, Mr. Conlin walked to the event in Frink Park from his home. EarthCorps encouraged volunteers to walk, bike, bus or carpool to the volunteer event sites in an effort to reduce the carbon emissions of those attending the events. Online directions included Google Maps with public transit routing and timetables, and links to the region’s new real-time ride-sharing technology provided by Goose Networks, which allows users to offer or hitch rides simply by texting on their cell phones.

To extend their engagement in reducing carbon emissions, volunteers received information about everyday actions they can take, and some received shore pines and sword ferns to plant in their own yards. EarthCorps encouraged participants to continue to volunteer to restore their local parks and habitats throughout the year.

Reduce-Reuse-Recycle-Restore = take the next step!

There are many ways to reduce, reuse, recycle and even add oxygen to the atmosphere! Top ten next steps:

1. Go native with native plants in your garden and use less water
2. Plant trees and restore forests with EarthCorps!
3. Get free native plants salvaged from construction sites around King County
4. Compost! You'll save on your and your city's trash bill and get plenty of fertilizer.
5. Buy products that use less packaging and stow a reusable shopping bag in your trunk, bike basket or backpack.
6. Play soccer with EarthCorps instead of watching TV.
7. Play board games instead of video games. Xeko is an environmentally oriented local board game company.
8. Bike, bus or carpool to work once a week. If you can't change your work commute, try changing your shopping commute: buy at local farmers' markets.
9. Turn electronics off. To avoid energy-sucking sleep mode, plug stereos, TVs, cell phone and battery chargers into a powerstrip or outlet with a switch.
10. Turn your car off. Idling or warming up cars wastes gas, pollutes the air, and doesn't help your motor. See more green driving tips from eSurance.

Posted in the December 2007 Earth Page

Northwest Solutions to Climate Change - Part 1 of 2 - Explaining Cap & Trade

- Submitted by Jesse Stanley from Earth Share organization NW Energy Coalition

In this two-part series, we will be featuring articles from two Earth Share of Washington organizations – NW Energy Coalition and Climate Solutions – offering potential solutions to the climate crisis. Part one delves into some of the strategies to lower CO2 emissions while part two outlines some specific legislation that makes up one of this year's Priorities for a Healthy Washington.

Global warming, and global-warming solutions, will dramatically affect Washington state residents in the coming years and decades. The state's coastal areas and shoreline cities are threatened by rising sea levels, and much of our electrical power - not to mention irrigation and municipal water supplies and other Columbia River benefits - depends on already diminishing mountain snow pack.

Thus, it's no accident that in the absence of a comprehensive federal approach, Washington is in the vanguard of states responding to the climate change challenge. The state has passed aggressive renewable energy and conservation standards and set limits on the amount of global-warming pollution that power plants serving its residents are allowed to emit.

And now Washington has assumed leadership of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), an association of states and provinces that have collectively committed to substantial reductions in total emissions of carbon dioxide and other climate-changing emissions. The WCI's current task is to fashion a regional “cap-and-trade” system to help achieve the reduction goals. Staff from the NW Energy Coalition, many of its member organizations and from other environmental and energy organizations are involved in helping to refine a proposal for release next August.

While the term "cap-and-trade" is being tossed around quite a bit these days at both the local national levels, it’s a hard concept to get your arms around. Basically, cap-and-trade systems are market-based approaches to reducing greenhouse gases. Government would impose a cap on total greenhouse emissions (principally carbon dioxide) and gradually lower that maximum. Government would distribute allowances – basically pollution permits – equal to the cap. Trading in those allowances is where the market comes in. Those with extra allowances could sell them to those wishing to pollute more than their permits allow.

Allowances would become valuable commodities. Businesses and utilities would save money by having to buy fewer of them, or make money by selling those they don’t use. An electric utility that reduces its global-warming emissions through investing in energy efficiency or clean renewable power could sell its freed-up allowances in the market.

Why do we need cap-and-trade in the electricity sector in Washington when we’ve already passed a clean-energy initiative and greenhouse-gas emissions performance standards? These laws work well for NEW electric generation decisions, but they have limited effect on existing fossil fuel plants.

The Northwest Power and Conservation Council recently noted that coal-fired power plants produce 80 percent of the region’s generation-related CO2 emissions. It says cutting climate emissions by at least 70 percent of 1990 levels by 2050 will require both aggressive development of conservation and renewables AND closure of all Northwest coal plants.

A well-designed cap-and-trade system for the electric sector could achieve that goal. We need a robust public debate because a fair and effective system requires some difficult decisions. For example:

1. Who gets the credits? Allowances can be granted to power generators based on their plants' emissions, or to utilities based either on the emissions created in producing the power that serves their customers, or simply on the amount of power they sell. The latter choice rewards utilities, such as Seattle City Light, for having relied primarily on hydropower. Their customers will benefit from sales of unneeded allowances to relatively carbon-heavy utilities, such as Puget Sound Energy. That satisfies the "polluter pays" principle, but is it fair to Puget customers, who have no choice about which utility serves them?
2. Free or auction? Auctioning off allowances makes polluters pay and gives them greater incentive to reduce emissions. But again, what’s the effect on consumers, especially those struggling financially, when rates rise to cover their utility’s emission permits? Revenue from the auction might be used to assist low-income consumers and spur clean-energy development.

Among the myriad other issues that merit public discussion are the rate of ramping down the cap, potential purchase of offsets in place of direct reductions, and avoiding the export of pollution and jobs to other countries. The questions aren't easy to answer, but we must address them and construct a fair and effective means to slash carbon emissions . . . and do it soon.

For a more in-depth discussion of cap-and-trade issues, you may watch a debate on the subject between two noted Western energy experts, Ralph Cavanagh of the Natural Resources Defense Council and Microdesign Northwest consulting economist Jim Lazar, which was recorded at the NW Energy Coalition's fall conference this October. See the debate at www.nwenergy.org/blog.

Posted in the November 2007 Earth Page

CAT Calls for Carbon Cuts

- By Emily Murphy from Earth Share organization NW Energy Coalition

With the federal government showing little leadership on clean energy and climate change, state and local governments are picking up the slack. This February, Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire issued an executive order known as the “Washington Climate Change Challenge” setting goals for reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. The goals were then codified through passage of Senate Bill 6001, which legally commits the state to reduced carbon emissions.

Developing initial strategies for reducing emissions and building a clean-energy economy is the responsibility the governor-appointed Climate Advisory Team. CAT members include representatives of assorted state interests -- businesses and manufacturers, state and local governments, and various public-interest, faith, labor and environmental groups.

Subgroups called Technical Working Groups or TWGs are now closely examining specific areas such as agriculture, transportation, forestry and energy supply and will forward their recommendations to the CAT. CAT members will evaluate input from the TWGs and the public during its five 2007 meetings, then present a suite of recommended programs and legislative proposals to the governor.

It is critical that the Climate Advisory Team endorse policies and programs that will slash global-warming pollution. To do so, the CAT must base its recommendations on:

• Sound science. Aside from a few well-funded naysayers, the international science community is quite clear that we must reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 in order to avoid the devastation associated with global warming. While an 80-percent reduction may seem overwhelming, it actually works out to a 2-percent reduction in current CO2 emission each year – a goal that’s well within our grasp.
• Clear legal commitment. Explicit policies and legislation are essential to reducing carbon emissions. In addition to market-based approaches, we must adopt firm, legally binding timelines with clear directives. Combined with natural market mechanisms, this approach will encourage investment and job opportunities in renewable energy, energy efficiency, low-carbon technology, green buildings and smart growth.

The people of Washington have a critical role to play in helping the CAT reach meaningful conclusions. Washingtonians should pay attention to the CAT process and tell team members what they think. A list of participants can be found at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/climatechange/cat_members.htm.

Washington state has the potential to set a national precedent for a low-carbon economy that benefits both public and private interests. Energy conservation is one of the cheapest and most effective means of avoiding greenhouse gas emissions. Tremendous economic opportunities in efficiency and renewable energy development abound in Washington. And transportation alternatives such as mass transit, biking and carpooling save one pound of carbon dioxide for each mile of driving eliminated. NW Energy Coalition is looking for engaged citizens to become more involved in shaping this exciting new policy.

For more information, please visit the NW Energy Coalition’s website at http://www.nwenergy.org/ or Climate Solutions at http://www.climatesolutions.org/

Posted in the August 2007 Earth Page

Volunteers Wanted for Clean Energy Initiative

- By Cy Berryman from ESW organization NW Energy Coalition

Washington State is taking an exciting step toward securing more clean energy for its citizens. A broad coalition of environmental, business and labor organizations, including the Sierra Club, United Steelworkers, NW Energy Coalition, and Congressman Jay Inslee, has launched an initiative for the November 2006 ballot. This initiative will ensure Washington’s largest electric utilities purchase 15% of their power from clean and renewable resources, like wind and solar, by 2020 and help consumers save on utility bills by improving energy efficiency in homes and businesses.

In 2004, just over 1 percent of Washington State’s electricity came from clean, renewable sources other than hydropower. Historically, our region has tapped low-cost hydropower from the region’s dams, providing around two-thirds of Washington’s electric power. Several years of low snow pack have dramatically demonstrated the dangers of over-reliance on such a climate-dependent resource.

Investments in clean energy provide a viable alternative to fossil fuels. New fossil fuel plants, like coal, are currently being proposed in Washington. Fossil fuels pollute our air and land, contribute to global warming, increase cases of asthma and lung disease, and cause severe rate hikes. We can avoid the negative impacts fossil fuels bring and protect our health and the environment with abundant, local clean energy sources such as wind and solar power.

Everyone in Washington will benefit from investments in clean and renewable energy because it:

• Protects consumers from the volatile price swings associated with fossil fuels, providing long-term rate stability.
• Reduces hazardous air pollution and global warming emissions.
• Creates thousands of family-supporting jobs in engineering, construction and building design.
• Benefits family farms and local economies. Farmers hosting wind projects earn up to $5,000 a year per wind turbine.

Passage of I-937 will add Washington to the list of 20 states (and the District of Columbia) that already have enacted similar standards, and make it the second -- after Colorado – to do so through an initiative.

To qualify the clean energy initiative for the November ballot, volunteers must gather over 160,000 signatures from Washington voters by June 30, 2006. Volunteers are needed from across the state to collect signatures to ensure that Washington voters have the opportunity to vote YES for clean energy on November 7th, 2006. Please call (206) 283-3335 today to volunteer or visit the campaign web site at www.yeson937.org for more information.

Posted in the March 2006 Earth Page

Biofuels Legislation Advancing in Olympia

- By Patrick Mazza from ESW organization Climate Solutions

Energy Independence legislation to require that Washington fuels contain a minimum share of biofuels is now moving forward in Olympia. Requested by Gov. Christine Gregoire, the bill's lead sponsors are Rep. Janea Holquist, a Columbia Basin Republican and Rep. Hans Dunshee, a Puget Sound Democrat. The measure is also one of the environmental community’s four lead priorities for the 2006 session (see www.environmentalpriorities.org).

The Energy Independence Bill, HB2738, calls for replacing 2.5% of our gasoline with ethanol and 2% of our diesel fuel with biodiesel in 2007. The biodiesel content will be increased to 5% and the ethanol content to 10% as Washington capacity to grow and make biofuels increases.

The win-win-win of a clean fuel that reduces air pollution and global warming gases, builds new markets for farmers and improves energy security draws support from across the aisle and state.

Reduce Washington's dependence on foreign fuels

Using more renewable fuels will increase our energy independence by powering our lives, our jobs and our economy with homegrown fuels. The U.S. imports 60% of its oil, and 20% of our imports come from the unstable Persian Gulf region. Imported oil also represents one-third of our trade deficit. Renewable fuels come from crops like canola, mustard and corn that are grown here.

Keep fuel dollars in our economy

Washington spends more than $9 billion per year on imported gasoline, dollars that do nothing to support our local economy. By comparison, we also spend $5-6 billion per year on K-12 education. The Energy Independence bill will take the first, needed step towards keeping those dollars in our economy, instead of sending them overseas.

Create new markets and new jobs for Eastern Washington

This legislation is being constructed to maximize use of Washington crops, but the production of biofuels alone will generate economic benefits: A 40 million gallon-per-year plant will create 41 direct jobs, $16 million in local purchases other than grain, and a $142 million local economic boost during construction.

Reduce global warming pollution

Biofuels reduce emissions of global warming pollution, which is a serious threat for our snow pack-dependent region. Global warming is caused by the accumulation of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. One of the largest sources of carbon dioxide is burning fossil fuels. By replacing fossil fuels with biofuels we take a real step toward combating global warming. Biodiesel represents a 78% greenhouse gas reduction.

Find out more and stay in touch.

Visit the campaign website, www.independentfuels.org.

Posted in the February 2006 Earth Page

Focusing for 2006: Priorities for a Healthy Washington

- Submitted by Washington Environmental Council

By working together, the environmental community achieved major wins last spring in the 2005 Legislative Session. A coalition of Washington environmental groups helped pass legislation setting new, cleaner car emissions standards, and they helped establish the nation’s first green building law requiring new public construction to use sustainable materials and design concepts. Passing these bills wasn’t easy, but it was made possible by thousands of environmentally minded people across the state who came together to support these priorities by spreading the word, writing to their newspaper, and calling their legislators to demand change.

This year is no different. The environmental coalition has narrowed their agenda to just a handful of joint priorities for the 2006 legislative session. They’re organizing for energy security, a cleaner Puget Sound, electronics recycling and the elimination of toxic flame retardants. They are also united to defend our state’s land protections. Their shared goal is to have these priorities signed into law in 2006 to ensure that our health and the health of our environment and economy will be protected.

Priorities for a Healthy Washington - 2006

• Promote Energy Independence Through Renewable Fuels. “Biofuels�? – renewable fuels produced using plant materials – can dramatically improve our energy security and agricultural viability by reducing expenditures on imported petroleum and providing a major new market for Washington farm products. Biofuels reduce emissions of global warming pollution, which is a serious threat for our snow pack-dependent region. By replacing some of our gasoline and diesel fuel with renewable fuels, this legislation will increase our energy independence by powering our lives, our jobs and our economy with homegrown fuels.
• Launch Electronic Waste Recycling. Millions of unwanted computers, monitors and TVs are piling up in homes in Washington State, and there are relatively few options available for their safe recycling. These obsolete electronics turn into millions of pounds of “e-waste�? each year, which contains toxic chemicals that are hazardous to human health and the environment. This legislation will give people a simple, free and safe way of recycling their old computers and TVs, creating jobs, conserving valuable resources and protecting public health.
• Clean Up Puget Sound. Puget Sound is in trouble. The water is polluted, our Orcas are endangered, and dead zones have destroyed marine habitat. Unfortunately, a recent Puget Sound Action Team report on the state of the Sound found that the solutions underway and those proposed are not scaled, paced or funded to match the magnitude of the problems the Sound faces. In this first step of our two year priority, we are working to support the Governor’s Puget Sound Initiative and to promote funding for cleanups, water quality improvements and shoreline restoration.
• Protect Kids’ Health by Eliminating Toxic Flame Retardants. PBDEs are persistent toxic chemicals used as flame retardants in countless consumer products including televisions, computers, furniture, and carpet. Chemical cousins of PCBs, these toxic flame retardants are rapidly building up in our bodies, our food supply, and wildlife. Building upon the significant progress made on this issue in 2005, the coalition will work to pass a bill that bans PBDEs, particularly the most heavily used form called “deca�?.

In addition, the defensive priority is to protect our quality of life from efforts to roll back land protections. The Growth Management Act has helped maintain a high quality of life in Washington over the past 15 years even as we have faced dramatic population growth. Unfortunately, these land protections are at risk as irresponsible developers seek to exploit fallout from Oregon’s Measure 37, an attempt to discard land use protections. The environmental community is united to combat this effort by halting the rollback of land use protections, and finding solutions to legitimate problems that hamper effective growth management.

Washington State's environmental community is building bipartisan support for these essential priorities. The public overwhelmingly supports a new generation of protections for our air, land and water, and our elected leaders are starting to respond. Working together, we can create a model for the nation and true legacy for generations to come.

The organizations participating in Priorities for a Healthy Washington are:
American Rivers
Audubon Washington
Center for Environmental Law & Policy
Climate Solutions
Conservation Northwest
Futurewise
Heart of America Northwest
League of Women Voters of Washington
NW Energy Coalition
People for Puget Sound
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Sierra Club Cascade Chapter
Transportation Choices Coalition
Washington Citizens for Resource Conservation
Washington Conservation Voters
Washington Environmental Council
WashPIRG
Washington Toxics Coalition

You can learn more about the Priorities for a Healthy Washington by visiting http://www.environmentalpriorities.org/ or by attending the upcoming workshop – see upcoming events listed below.

Posted in the January 2006 Earth Page

New Coal Plant Planned Western Washington Promises Significant CO2 Emissions

A few months ago Energy Northwest, formerly known as the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS), announced its plan to build a new coal plant in Kalama, just south of Longview, Washington. Energy Northwest, an agency comprised of 19 public utilities, is working with the Port of Kalama, which recently approved a 50-year lease for an 80-acre industrial site for the coal plant.

The project has been dubbed the Pacific Mountain Energy Center (PMEC), an idyllic-sounding title that masks the real nature of the proposed facility. PMEC is promoted as an “environmentally friendly�? resource that will bring family-wage jobs and economic development to the Kalama area. It would consist of two 300-megawatt coal-powered plants. Public utilities would finance and get the power from one; private interests would purchase power from the second plant.

Because the $1 billion facility will utilize so-called “clean coal�? technology – specifically integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology – it should produce far fewer pollutants than traditional coal plants do. IGCC technology is effective in dramatically reducing the volume of emissions that cause smog and acid rain, for example.

Traditional coal plants are noted for the tremendous amounts of climate-changing carbon dioxide they produce. But while IGCC technology offers the potential of capturing CO2 for long-term storage, Energy Northwest has decided against installing what would be a very expensive add-on. The agency notes that the technology to permanently store (sequester) the vast amounts of carbon dioxide the plant will emit simply does not yet exist.

That means the plant would dump millions of tons of CO2 into our atmosphere, worsening the global warming that’s already affecting the Northwest’s hydropower supply. Replacing a dirty coal plant with an IGCC plant is one thing; choosing a climate-worsening option over readily available, less costly and truly clean energy options is a great concern.

Energy Northwest officials express commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency, but don’t believe they will provide enough power to meet growing demand. That belief flies in the face of the energy prescription written by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, the regional energy-planning entity, in its Fifth Northwest Power Plan, released in the past year.

The Council projected the region’s 20-year power needs and evaluated various means of meeting those needs in the most cost-effective way. It first determined that half the growth in demand should be met with energy efficiency. Almost all of the rest, the Council said, should come from renewable energy. The Council’s recommendations reflected the findings of a 2002 NW Energy Coalition-commissioned study that found the Northwest has nearly three times as much potential cost-competitive clean energy as the expected growth in energy demand.

By no means is the Kalama coal plant a done deal. Energy Northwest must secure permits from the state’s Energy Facility and Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), the “one-stop shopping�? entity for permitting large-scale power plants. Energy Northwest estimates this process will take about 20-months.

The NW Energy Coalition and other advocates of clean, stable and affordable energy see the proposed coal plant as a major step backward for Washington residents. True, coal won’t be burned directly to produce electricity (it will be gasified first), but that does little to reduce emissions of climate-changing gases.

Plus, coal will never be “clean�? as long as it’s mined. The environmental and human health effects of coal mining and transportation are staggering.

Ultimately, wouldn’t we all be better off investing the $1 billion this inadequate facility will cost in renewable energy and energy efficiency? If we care about protecting our pocketbooks, our environment and our health, the answer must be “yes.�?

For more information and to learn how to get involved, contact Lisa Noble-Rennick at (206) 621-0094.

Posted in the January 2006 Earth Page

Big Wins for a Healthy Washington - A legislative wrap up

- By Tom Geiger from Earth Share organization Washington Environmental Council

For the third year in a row, leading conservation groups working at the state level have successfully advocated for new and improved laws to better protect people, land, air and water in Washington.

A new law to promote green building, as well as a law to clean our air by limiting auto emissions, will help people and nature breathe a little easier. Progress was also made on helping promote the health of Hood Canal and Puget Sound, and eliminate some very toxic chemicals from our household products.

The conservation community's development of four common-sense Priorities for a Healthy Washington for the 2005 session was crucial to this success. (To learn more, go to www.environmentalpriorities.org) Instead of going to the Capitol with a laundry list, the short list made a splash from the get-go. The Seattle P-I's editorial on December 27th called our proposals "a smart approach that should help lawmakers of both parties focus on a few areas where action can make a difference."

Now we are celebrating some great success. After lots of hard work by the conservation community, all our partners and key legislative supporters, the Seattle Times opined: "Give the environmental community credit as well. For the third session, asking for less has meant more success."

We are making progress and are being successful in getting real improvements to the laws that will help millions of people live healthier lives.

Here is a summary of what happened to each of the four 2005 Priorities for a Healthy Washington.

High Performance Green Buildings

On April 8th, Governor Gregoire signed this bill into law. The new law requires state buildings, schools, and universities to be built and certified as high performance, green buildings. This will result in buildings that save energy and water, are cheaper to operate, and improve student learning and employee performance.

Cleaner Air - Cleaner Cars

The Governor signed Cleaner Air - Cleaner Cars into law on May 6th. We'll all breathe easier with cleaner cars - that's a win worth smiling about! Cleaner Air - Cleaner Cars will reduce cancer-causing emissions and global warming pollution from new cars, increase consumer choice, and save consumers a bundle at the gas pump.

Sound Solutions - Saving Hood Canal and Puget Sound

While major bills did not pass, the conservation community secured over $6 million dollars for local clean water projects, including funds to clean up Hood Canal, and a grant and loan program to help homeowners fix failing septic systems. A bill to prioritize tax incentives for habitat buffers did pass. And a key bill that would reduce water pollution from septic systems passed the House but came two votes shy of going to the full Senate for a vote.

Phasing out Toxics

The Priority to phase out a particularly toxic set of flame-retarding chemicals failed to pass the legislature. However, the legislature did provide funding to the Department of Ecology to develop a plan for banning the most widely used form of toxic these chemicals. The department will report back to the legislature with recommendations in December.

Other Good News

Some other good bills that passed include: Oil Spill Prevention; improvements to the state's approach to transportation funding; a new program for the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program; and programs to increase solar power, renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Priorities for a Healthy Washington is a combined effort of Earth Share organizations American Rivers, Audubon Washington, Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Climate Solutions, Futurewise, NW Energy Coalition, People for Puget Sound, Sierra Club, Transportation Choices Coalition, Washington Citizens for Resource Conservation, Washington Environmental Council, and Washington Toxics Coalition and includes other non-Earth Share members League of Women Voters of Washington, Northwest Ecosystem Alliance, Washington Conservation Voters, and WashPIRG.

Posted in the June 2005 Earth Page

Mountain Forecast: Sunny with a chance of rate increases

-By Louise Alexander

Guest author Louise Alexander contributes through Earth Share's Journalism Internship Program. In addition to writing for Earth Share, she is a Project Manager for EarthCorps, leading volunteer restoration crews on projects around Puget Sound.

February has always been the hardest month, even for an East Coast native. The festivity of seasons has passed with little to look forward to, the days are shorter, and spring is a distant horizon; untouchable. But in the Puget Sound, winter in Seattle is the price one must pay for beautiful summers and rings of snowcapped mountains. The days darken in the early afternoon and the cold, constant rain and cloud cover is a daily reminder of what season it is. But February of 2005 was the antithesis of the infamous winters of Seattle. Almost every day was characterized by clear, sunny skies with perfect views of the bare mountains of the Olympics and Cascades. Yet enjoying respite in rain was bittersweet for many people, because we rely on the rain and cold days of winter.

The state of Washington suffered a decline in tourism as the ski mountains and resorts were unable to open for much of the season due to a lack of snow. Beyond this immediate economic hurt, there is also the issue of a lack of water in the spring and summer that comes from snowmelt. This will have direct repercussions on irrigation for agriculture as well as presenting an inhospitable environment for strong salmon and fish runs, as rivers dry up to shadows of what they should be. However, there is another strain on the economy. Hydropower is a major source of energy for the Northwest.

Ed Mosey from the Bonneville Power Administration admits with no hesitation that the water situation in Washington may lead to increased electricity rates this summer. "We measure the amount of water that is available by picking a place, in this case the Dalles Dam, and we measure during the high flow months of January to July. The measurement is 1 foot of water over an acre. In early March our measurements read at 70 million acre feet which is about 66% of our average flow and every time we measure the number goes down. 2001 was the worst year for water. We were in a drought and the amount of water we measured at a reading was 58 million acre feet."

Thanks to sustained spring rains, the situation isn't as dire as it looked in March. Bonneville Power hopes that there's enough water to produce the necessary power to meet the needs of Washington, but may be forced to seek a rate increase due to reduced market sales. Mosey explains that, "normally there are sufficient amounts of reserve water that [Bonneville Power] can sell hydropower to other, drier states like California, and the money lost from those sales will have to be made up in increased rates".

Lack of available water is a statewide problem, with several people paying close attention to how agencies like Bonneville Power will respond. Marc Krasnowsky, the Communications Director of the NW Energy Coalition states, "We'll soon find out if the region learned from the 2000-01 energy crisis and drought, when tens of thousands of baby salmon and steelhead died when hydro-system operators pushed for more electricity production at their expense." And here lies perhaps one of the region's greatest dilemmas. In a low-water year, how do we choose between power production and protecting wildlife and the environment? Krasnowsky believes that, "this choice almost always spells disaster for migrating salmon and steelhead."

Yet both groups can agree that hydropower, Washington's biggest supplier of energy, cannot be counted on to meet the growing demands of the region or state. Krasnowsky remarks, "Hydropower is a great renewable resource, but it is not without its challenges. We must recognize that it is limited and even without the projected warm-weather reductions, can't meet growing needs". But the question is how these challenges will be met. According to Mosey, "the past four or five years have all been very dry. But we have only been recording the amount of water we receive since the 1920s, so we don't know if this is part of a larger cycle or something more random. But this year is an example of how we can't rely on hydropower for energy, but have to develop new sustainable energy and technology. We are hoping to announce new technology using computer-driven technology. I can't discuss the details now, but it is very exciting and wind definitely plays a part in it."

As a community, the Puget Sound cannot rely on groups to advocate for sustainability, or for power companies to hand us an easy solution that requires no effort on our part. Individuals must choose sustainability and conservation. The ability to turn a tap and have water flow is a privilege that we cannot afford to abuse. Because by the time we have to choose between salmon spawning and irrigation, we have already lost the time when we can afford to be ignorant of our situation. And eventually, there will be an entire month of days when there is not a drop of water, and we will sorely miss the reliable rain of February.

Posted in the June 2005 Earth Page

Plan maps out clean energy path for Washington and the region

- submitted by Lisa Noble-Rennick from ESW organization NW Energy Coalition

The Northwest Power and Conservation Council, made up of two governor-appointed representatives each from Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana, develops a power plan for the four-state region every five years. The plans recommend ways to guarantee adequate and reliable electricity for Northwest consumers at the least economic and environmental cost.

The Council released its draft Fifth Power and Conservation Plan last fall, took extensive public comment in October and November, and finalized the plan on Dec. 16. Long-time advocates for clean and affordable energy in the Northwest saw their efforts rewarded with Council recommendations to meet roughly half the region's expected 20-year growth in electricity demand with energy efficiency (because it's cheaper than anything else, including existing hydropower) and to build virtually no new power resources other than wind facilities in the short term.

Throughout the comment period, NW Energy Coalition and its allies pushed for a strong regionwide commitment to energy efficiency and renewable energy. The final plan reflects that hard work:

Energy efficiency -- The final plan calls for 140 average megawatts of new efficiency per year between now and 2009 and for total development of more than 2,500 average megawatts of efficiency over the 20-year period. A city the size of Seattle uses about 1,080 average megawatts of energy per year, so this is a huge amount of energy efficiency. The bulk of the savings will be found in efficient lighting, motors and heating/cooling systems.

Renewable energy -- The Council's final plan calls for building considerably more new wind in the next five years than suggested in the draft. The amount of wind now recommended for the entire 20-year period could easily power two Seattle-sized cities!

Coal --The Council originally said the region should prepare to build a new 400-megawatt coal plant sometime after 2009. New coal remains a possibility in the final plan, though construction has been pushed farther into the future and is dependent on increased power needs and the future cost of coal - including the cost of carbon regulation.

Fish -- The Council is responsible for overseeing a fish and wildlife program that balances the Northwest's environmental and energy needs. But its draft power plan disregarded salmon issues. The final plan recognizes the link between power production and salmon survival and suggests development of a method for calculating the risk to fish presented by inadequate power supply.

Overall, the Fifth Northwest Power and Conservation Plan puts the region on-course for a clean and affordable energy future. The next step is ensuring implementation of the plan's clean-energy recommendations. The Council is committed to meeting these goals and will be holding meetings over the next year on all of the action items.

Posted in the February 2005 Earth Page

Cleaner Cars, Cleaner Air

- by Sarah Jaynes from ESW organization Climate Solutions

Like most of us, my daily life hauling around two small children often requires that I drive a car. However, I share the concern of many Washingtonians about the toll that car emissions are taking on our health and our environment. Cars and trucks are the number one source of Washington's air pollution, causing asthma, cancer, and global warming.

Hybrids and diesel cars are one answer. Another is to pass cleaner auto emissions (clean car) standards, one of the environmental community's Priorities for a Healthy Washington. Clean cars are regular cars that reduce dangerous air pollution, burn less gas and save people money. With these standards, all new cars sold in Washington after 2008 will emit less pollution, while saving on fuel.

Passing clean car standards this year will:

• Reduce cancer-causing automobile emissions such as benzene and formaldehyde.
• Save $2.3 billion for Washington state consumers by 2020 .
• Start reducing our dependence on foreign oil.
• Enable Washington to reduce global warming pollution from new cars by roughly 30% by 2016.

Eight other states have already adopted these standards, and we know from their experience that clean cars make sense.

Best of all, we don't need to worry about being able to afford a clean car. These new clean cars actually put money back in our pockets. Cars that meet global warming emission standards have reduced operating costs and fuel consumption. For example, if you finance your car over 5 years, you would save $18 in fuel costs per month, while spending only $7 more per month on your car payment. That's $11 in your pocket every month, while cleaning up our air.

I want to be able to make the choice to drive a cleaner car. Californians currently enjoy the choice of 25 cleaner vehicle models that are not available in Washington. You probably know people who have had to wait 6-12 months to purchase popular hybrids. That's because they are first delivered to California and other states with clean car standards. But this isn't just about hybrids. Virtually every car model you want to buy (even the biggest SUVs) can meet the new standards cost-effectively with technology that is already available. To read more about consumer choice and savings, visit www.cleancarswashington.org.

As I'm writing this article, balmy, rainy January weather has caused widespread flooding and ski area closures. We have no time to lose. Unchecked climate disruption is a major threat to Washington's economy and environment. Washington and Oregon's Cascade snowpack - which drives our power, water, agriculture, and habitat systems - is projected to decline by 59% by the 2050s without swift action. Children in Seattle and Spokane have asthma rates nearly twice the national average.

I hope you'll join Climate Solutions in getting involved in this effort. Now is our chance to make a big difference in the quality of our air. To get involved, please send an email to sarah@climatesolutions.org, or visit the campaign website www.cleancarswashington.org.

Posted in the February 2005 Earth Page

Priorities for a Healthy Washington

- submitted by Tom Geiger from ESW organization Washington Environmental Council

My son Isaiah was born about the same time as the Legislative Partnership between Washington Environmental Council and Washington Conservation Voters was established - the Fall of 2002. This partnership, working with the broader conservation and public interest groups, has worked to develop a list of winning priorities for the 2005 Legislative Session beginning January 10th.

Isaiah's future, and the legacy for all kids in the next generation will be improved because we are pushing priorities that will change people's lives for the better. At the same time, we all recognize that this work goes hand-in-hand with the creation of good jobs and a strong economy.

Recent legislative sessions have produced positive gains for old-growth forests, restoring streams and shorelines, attacking pollution, and reducing greenhouse gases. These ongoing achievements reflect the conservation ethic embraced by a majority of Washington voters. And they suggest our state's elected officials are paying more attention to their constituents.

Action on this year's Priorities for a Healthy Washington (listed below) will enhance our health and help preserve the treasures of the wonderful state we all call home.

Clean Air Through Clean Cars
Smart new technology allows cars to pollute less and save fuel. Eight states have Clean Car standards that provide a wider choice of cleaner cars, trucks, and SUVs than we have. Why shouldn't Washingtonians have those same choices? Clean Car legislation will ensure that new cars sold in Washington after 2008 use proven technology that reduces cancer-causing air toxics and global warming pollution.

Better Building for Sustainability and Efficiency
Facilities constructed with state money should be safe, healthy, and support our environment. That means using non-toxic and sustainable materials and design concepts. These buildings will save taxpayer money because the buildings are cheaper to operate; help conserve water and keep our air clean; and provide healthy environments that help students learn better and government workers be more efficient.

Sound Solutions: Saving Hood Canal and Puget Sound
Puget Sound is in trouble; much of it fails to meet basic clean water standards. The "dead zone" in Hood Canal represents a much larger problem. Unchecked development is polluting our marine waters and forcing many shellfish beds to close. Restoring and protecting our vital marine waters and ecosystems will provide safe recreational opportunities, promote clean water-dependent business in such areas as shellfish, fishing, and tourism, and enhance our quality of life.

Banning Toxic Flame Retardants
Scientists are finding chemical cousins of PCBs, the toxic flame retardants PBDEs, everywhere they look. PBDEs are in orca whales, ospreys, and even the breast milk of Puget Sound moms. Developing babies are most at risk, being exposed to PBDEs when they leach out of products and contaminate our home, food chain, and bodies. The legislature can protect our children's health and prevent the next PCB tragedy by banning all forms of PBDEs by 2006.

Washington State's environmental community is building bipartisan support for these essential priorities. The public overwhelmingly supports a new generation of protections for our health and this place we call home, and our elected leaders are starting to respond. Working together, we can create a model for the nation and true legacy for generations to come.

To learn more about how to become more involved supporting the 2005 legislative priorities, please see the upcoming events section below, which includes the 2005 Legislative Workshop on January 8 and Citizen's Lobby Day on February 17.

Posted in the January 2005 Earth Page

Climate Change (Part 2 of 2)

Policy, Action, and Opportunities

University of Washington environmental studies majors Ara Clark and Emily Raforth spent their summer taking part in an Environmental Journalism internship for Earth Share of Washington. Their interest in climate change and environmental ethics stems from their coursework through the Program on the Environment at the UW. This is the second installment of their 2-part series exploring the physical and social implications of climate change in the Pacific Northwest.

After spending part 1 of our series confronting the harsh scientific reality of climate change, in part 2, we wanted to highlight opportunities for businesses, government, and individuals. Our vision for this article is to make climate policy and solutions accessible. We wanted to know what our government is doing to protect our environment and us. What do people need to know about climate change politics? What are some positive solutions to the global warming crisis and what is being done in the Pacific Northwest? What can the average citizen do to make a difference?

For policy information, we approached two Washington congressmen who are actively involved in climate change issues, Jay Inslee (House of Reps - Dist. 1) and Jim McDermott (House of Reps - Dist. 7). Surprisingly, both congressmen lamented that the public is "light years" ahead of policy with respect to climate change.

There appears to be a vicious cycle between public indifference and political inaction. The public trusts that if an issue were serious enough, the government would be doing something about it. Without public pressure and support, the government is reluctant to forge ahead and we are left with a stagnant environmental policy. However, there has been a positive shift within the political arena towards embracing the science and recognizing the opportunity for economic growth and energy independence.

In October of 2003, Senators John McCain (R-Ariz) and Joe Lieberman (D-CT) introduced the bi-partisan Climate Stewardship Act came up for a vote in the U.S. Senate. Although it did not pass, 43 senators supported the McCain-Lieberman bill, demonstrating much greater support than just a few years before.

Congressman Inslee is leading the New Apollo Energy Project, "designed to bring the same type of optimistic and visionary leadership to [the climate change] effort that Kennedy brought to the space race." The New Apollo Project hopes to revolutionize our national energy policy. We spoke to the Congressman over the phone and he explained that, "the three goals [of the Apollo project] are 1) to break our addiction to Middle Eastern oil, 2) to stop, or at least slow down, global climate change, and 3) to grow new high-tech jobs in America rather than in Japan, Denmark, and Germany."

For a non-partisan political opinion, we turned to the advocacy group Climate Solutions, a non-profit organization dedicated to researching and promoting "practical and profitable solutions to the global warming crisis." We spoke with their policy director, K.C. Golden, whose optimistic attitude can be summarized with the mantra, "the climate change issue is big, but not overwhelming. People caused it, people can fix it."

Being a supporter of the Climate Stewardship Act, Golden believes that "a sound energy and climate policy" are essential steps towards a positive solution. Golden's idea of a sound energy policy is based on converting from our fossil fuel-based market, to a clean energy economy with responsible limits on global warming pollution. Golden's advice to policy makers is to "recognize the truth of the science in policy."

Can we really break our fossil fuel addiction, and is it even worth it? Inslee, Golden, and McDermott stressed the potential economic benefits of energy independence and the necessary switch to alternative energy sources. Golden surprised us by saying, "wind is now the fastest growing alternative energy source worldwide. It is cost-competitive with the cheapest fossil fuels." All three spoke of the potential for employment opportunities associated with the growth of alternative energy industries. According to Jay Inslee's official web site, "a 'New Apollo [Energy] Project' would stimulate $1.4 trillion in new gross domestic product (GDP), and add $953 billion in personal income and $323 billion in retail sales. The Northwest is very well positioned to benefit economically from such an initiative."

"Already, energy efficiency and utility incentives have saved the people of the Pacific Northwest $500 million," said Golden. And there is the potential to double this amount.

Despite relatively little action on behalf of the federal government, some states and industries are taking their own initiative to combat the effects of climate change. While we were doing research, news headlines everywhere announced that California approved revolutionary new vehicle emissions standards targeted specifically at reducing global warming. Automakers are already gearing up to repeal the decision that will cut approximately 30% of California's CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. If all goes as planned, the new standards will go into effect in 2009. California has the nation's largest auto market, accounting for 20% of national sales, making this one of the most important anti-global warming actions on the state level. This forces automakers to comply and will allow smaller states, such as Washington, to mandate similar standards.

Refusing to be passive bystanders, Pacific Northwest ski resorts are banding together to fight climate change that could be the ruin of their industry. The Keep Winter Cool Program is a coalition between the National Resources Defense Council and the National Ski Areas Association designed "to raise visibility and public understanding of global warming and spotlight opportunities that exist right now to start fixing the problem." Skiers, for example, may have the option to purchase Green Tags along with their lift tickets for a few extra dollars. Green Tags are a mechanism by which the purchaser can offset their personal carbon dioxide emissions by investing in alternative energy sources.

So what can the average citizen do? There are so many opportunities to make a difference in the fight against climate change. "For your next car, buy a hybrid. My whole family drives hybrid cars," declared McDermott during our interview. For Golden, "the first step is wasting less." So we compiled our own Top 10 Simple Solutions that individuals can do to help combat climate change.

Top 10 Simple Solutions

1. Support local "green power" through your local utility
2. Modify your transportation - buy a hybrid, carpool/vanpool, walk, bike, use public transportation
3. Support climate policy - be an informed voter, write your elected officials
4. Make your home energy efficient - install triple pane windows, low flow water devices, proper insulation, and long-life light bulbs
5. Spread the word! Educate yourself, your kids, and everyone else
6. Waste less - reduce/reuse/recycle
7. Get Involved - volunteer, find out what people in your community are doing
8. Save water!
9. Support local economies - such as farmers markets
10. Buy Green Tags to offset your personal carbon emissions from driving, flying, etc.

The Pacific Northwest has the potential to be a leader in climate change policy and related industries. We must first dispel the myth that being environmentally responsible is expensive and prohibitive. Rather, it can bring hope and vitality to local communities while addressing a global issue at the same time. Having an emotional and intimate connection to the problem encourages people to make themselves part of the solution.

For more information about how to be part of the solution, please visit the website of Earth Share of Washington organization Climate Solutions - www.climatesolutions.org.

Posted in the December 2004 Earth Page

Burnin' the bean

My story about converting to biodiesel
- by Dave Manelski, Earth Page Editor and Earth Share of Washington Program Coordinator

No, this bean burning is not some sort of new recreational drug. In fact, the bean in question is none other than the soybean, and biodiesel is a clean-burning renewable fuel derived from the North American soybean (Glycine max). In keeping with the theme of the December Earth Page on climate change, I would like to share my story of purchasing a new car, one of the ten simple steps mentioned above.

BACKGROUND

Through my work at Earth Share of Washington, I've become acutely aware of the impending climate crisis, and the dangers associated with runaway greenhouse gas emissions.

Instead of falling prey to this impending sense of doom, my wife and I decided to take a proactive step to be a part of the solution. Since automobiles are the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, we wanted to make a conscientious decision about our new car purchase.

Before exploring the options, let me first explain what features we valued in a new car. We wanted a car that fit our lifestyle, that wasn't overly difficult to maintain and refuel anywhere in the country. It had to be big enough to accommodate our two dogs, and sturdy enough to make the occasional ski and camping trip. Finally, it had to limit our greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce our reliance on foreign oil.

Fortunately, there are many "green" options available in the vehicle marketplace today. The perfect storm is brewing to propel alternative fuels and high fuel efficiency vehicles into the mainstream:

1. Oil prices recently surged to record highs due to high demand, political strife, and predictions by renowned economists and scientists that oil production is peaking or will peak in the near future. One thing is certain however; oil is a finite resource.
2. The depressed rural economy has forced farmers to search for new markets for their products.
3. To meet consumer demand for cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles, automakers have developed many profitable new technologies, including alternative fuel vehicles and hybrids.
4. New laws are being proposed and enacted to provide incentives for alternative fuels and fuel efficiency.

The are 5 major green car technologies available today - compressed natural gas (CNG), biodiesel, ethanol, fuel cells, and hybrids. All 5 options are designed to either decrease pollution, increase fuel efficiency, or curb carbon dioxide emissions - the primary greenhouse gas. Of them all, CNG is the cleanest burning. It is a popular fuel for fleet vehicles, including Pierce Transit buses, and some Washington taxicabs. However, storing compressed gas has obvious safety concerns, and there are only a few cars on the market that are designed to accept this fuel. Because of the limited availability of vehicles and fuel stations, we quickly ruled out a CNG vehicle. Ethanol is a renewable fuel derived from corn. Although it is clean burning, its production is fairly energy intensive, vehicles need modifications to run ethanol, and it has a limited distribution network. And while fuel cells might be the most promising long-term solution, there are currently no cars available for sale. Why, you ask? Because most fuel cells require hydrogen as fuel, which is not found in its pure form on our planet. Currently, it requires more than twice the energy to produce hydrogen than the fuel cell produces.

DECISIONS DECISIONS...

After ruling out CNG, ethanol, and fuel cells, we were left with two options - biodiesel and hybrids - both excellent green vehicle options, and both readily available. First, a bit about these two:

• Hybrid - Hybrid vehicles run on a gasoline engine and an electric motor. They use batteries to store energy from the engine and recapture the energy of motion when braking, called regenerative braking. These batteries then drive electric motors, which assist the gasoline engine, and allow it to operate more efficiently. Because the energy needed to run a vehicle is recaptured and stored, these vehicles use much less gasoline than their non-hybrid counterparts. There are quite a few hybrid vehicles on the market right now, including popular cars like the Toyota Prius, Honda Civic, Ford Escape SUV, and many others coming soon.
• Biodiesel - While there aren't any biodiesel vehicles per se, biodiesel runs without modifications in any new diesel vehicle, and can be blended with diesel fuel in any mixture. Diesel cars are inherently more efficient that gasoline cars because the fuel holds about 20-30% more energy, resulting in higher miles per gallon. While diesel has a dirty reputation for being smoky, smelly, and loud, biodiesel burns much cleaner, and releases nearly 80% less carbon dioxide. Most North American biodiesel is produced from soybeans and these plants soak up carbon dioxide throughout their lifespan. There is a growing network of fuel distributors around the country, and many diesel vehicles on the market.

We could not have gone wrong with either option. Both offer significant gains in fuel efficiency, multiple vehicle options, ease of maintenance & refueling, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. What ultimately drove our decision was reducing our reliance on foreign oil. Because biodiesel is produced in the U.S., we would be supporting U.S. farmers instead of shipping our money overseas, and supporting an oil infrastructure that threatens the environment in many different ways - from oil spills to arctic drilling.

In October of this year, my wife and I purchased a 2005 Volkswagen Passat Wagon TDI (diesel). We buy B100 (100%) biodiesel from a station in Seattle's Ballard neighborhood - Dr. Dan's FuelWerks (www.fuelwerks.com). Although biodiesel costs more than conventional diesel and gasoline, it's worth every penny to feel confident that we are part of the solution to mitigate the effects of climate change. As an aside, the first biodiesel tax incentive was signed into federal law in October, promising to grow this blossoming industry, and reduce prices at the pump.

GREEN CARS FOR EVERYONE

The most important lesson that I learned in my research is that there are dozens of green vehicle options for every lifestyle. In the 1970's, fuel efficiency was associated with small cars and dirty diesels. Today, green vehicles are available in all shapes and sizes, from SUVs, to pickup trucks, to station wagons, like our Passat. Alternative fuels that were once hard to find, and on the fringe of eco-lifestyle, are now widely available. In fact, the largest consumer of biodiesel in Washington is King County Metro, who recently adopted the use of a biodiesel blend in all their buses.

Burnin' the bean is hardly a new drug, but it sure is addictive!

RESOURCES

Green Car Congress
www.greencarcongress.com

BiodieselNow
www.biodieselnow.org

National Biodiesel Board
www.biodiesel.org

Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition
www.pugetsoundcleancities.org

Posted in the December 2004 Earth Page

Climate Change (Part 1 of 2)

Learning the Science

University of Washington environmental studies majors Ara Clark and Emily Raforth are spending their summer taking part in an Environmental Journalism internship for Earth Share of Washington. Their interest in climate change and environmental ethics stems from their coursework through the Program on the Environment at the UW. This is the first installment of their 2-part series exploring the physical and social implications of climate change in the Pacific Northwest.

Dismissing the debate

Pens, notebooks, and $30 tape recorder in-hand, we set out on our first interviews to better understand the science of climate change. For answers, we turned to Dr. Richard Gammon, climate science professor at the University of the Washington. As former students of professor Gammon's spring quarter climate policy class, we were familiar with his passion for climate change and mind-blowing propensity for spitting out rapid-fire, detail-laden responses.

We were looking for scientific proof and personal reflections from Dr. Gammon. What are some specific impacts of climate change here in the Northwest? With so much evidence that humans are causing climate change and so many positive clean energy solutions available, why do the media still focus on the 'science debate' that scientists say is already settled? And how do we communicate the science to the public?

Q: What statistics about climate change do find most compelling?

RG: He rephrased our question for us, "you mean what can you tell people to convince them?" Pausing for a moment he stated matter-of-factly, "atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is at a level the Earth hasn't seen for half a million years, not to mention rapid retreat and melting of arctic ice and glaciers world wide." Dr. Gammon then cited several local effects, "we are in the middle of a six year drought, the Northwest is seeing increased forest fires, and by the middle of this century, we will have lost half of the annual snow-pack in the Cascades. Northwest average temperatures have risen 1.5 F in the last century and are expected to rise another .5 F by 2020."

According to Gammon, "the role of human activity as a primary driver [of climate change] is now accepted by most climate scientists. You both know people who don't accept the climate science; they think we are still arguing about it. It's like they are addicted smokers convinced there is no connection between smoking and lung cancer. We need to convince those skeptics to move beyond that denial because this problem is not going to go away."

For obvious reasons, the most notable skeptics are the oil and coal industries. Outspoken skeptical scientists exist, but it is important to note that they are the minority when compared to the 2,000+ scientists from more than 100 countries that comprise the United Nations Environmental Programme's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In our research visiting the websites of several prominent skeptics organizations, the same half dozen scientists were named as contributors.

Overwhelmed by these statistics we asked each other, how does this affect our lives? Snow pack loss alone impacts our winter recreation, the water we drink, and iconic northwest wildlife and their habitat. Implications of our changing climate will seriously impact local industries such as agriculture, fisheries, and forestry. It affects everyone.

Our next interview was with KC Golden of Climate Solutions, one of the nations leading grassroots climate advocacy groups. Golden has been involved with climate policy in the Pacific Northwest for the past 10 years. He served as special assistant to the Mayor of Seattle for clean energy and climate protection initiatives. He also served as the Assistant Director of Washington's Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development, where he directed the Energy Division and the state's energy policy office.

Q: What specific people and industries are most affected by climate change in the Pacific Northwest?

KC: The loss of Cascade snow pack is the single most devastating impact. Water from Cascade snow is the backbone of our power supply. It makes agriculture and salmon possible.

In a nutshell, if we don't get enough snow in the winter, we won't have enough water to carry us through the dry parts in the year. Our climate will be wetter in all the wrong places at all the wrong times, causing winter and spring flooding which affect salmon spawning grounds. Snow pack and quality of life go hand in hand in the Northwest. Decreasing annual snow pack will severely impact all ski resorts below 5,000 feet in elevation. We were reminded of a statement from our interview with Dr. Gammon that, "plans to ski at Snoqualmie Pass in 2050 will be non-existent."

Golden also mentioned the threats to our great forests. With warmer winters come extensive pest damage, as British Columbia is already experiencing with the Mountain Pine Beetle. These infestations leave forests vulnerable to increased forest fire frequency and intensity.

Forests and snow are the essence of our livelihood in the Pacific Northwest, with their loss we will lose our regional uniqueness.

Telling the Story

The idea of simply reporting on climate science was frustrating, inaccessible, and difficult for us to grasp. Considering the impending doom descending upon us and the seemingly impossible task of communicating the impacts of climate change, we asked our interviewees to step into the shoes of a journalist. How do we share this information, why should people care, and what are some solutions? Gammon was outspoken about what he sees as a false debate over climate change presented by the media, "we don't stage media debates over whether or not the Earth is round." Amazingly he advocated using a personal approach when communicating the science of climate change. "Most people aren't excited or moved by graphs, unlike myself. You can more effectively reach out by telling the story of climate change in a personal way."

KC Golden advised us to find the right balance in our climate change storytelling. From his perspective, climate stories should be true to the science and sobering, yet upbeat. "It's hard to absorb a story that is all doomsday. It's not that people don't believe the science - they just numb out because it can be too overwhelming."

We emerged from the interviews considering climate change from a much broader perspective. Dr. Gammon talked about the importance of considering the social, economic, political, and ethical aspects of this broad issue. He opened our eyes to the need for a humanistic and holistic approach to climate science. His advice is to, "be involved in understanding the science and be politically active." He wasn't necessarily talking about sign waving and protest-marching; he was implying that a firm grasp of the science empowers people to be environmentally aware and involved citizens.

With forest fires on the evening news and record-breaking temperatures across the state, climate change was on our minds this summer. After speaking with one of the most prominent Northwest climate scientists and one of the most outspoken climate advocates, it is not only the science that is compelling, but the personal stories of the families and businesses being affected by climate change today. The story of climate change is important to tell because we are all living the reality of climate change; it affects our forests, our economy, and our quality of life here in the Pacific Northwest.

Refusing to be helpless bystanders, we wanted to address the tremendous opportunities for people and businesses in the Pacific Northwest to make a difference. Through economic development of alternative energy, a sound climate policy, and responsible individual actions, we can change the course of our climate future.

Stay tuned for our next installment in the December Earth Page. Instead of letting the gloom and doom drown us, we sought out proactive solutions: Policy, Action and Opportunities in Part 2 of Climate Change.

Posted in the November 2004 Earth Page

Solutions are all about Connections

- submitted by Joelle Robinson from ESW organization Climate Solutions

Over 60 of the region's most active climate leaders have formed the Northwest Climate Connections project. Connections is a network of opportunity whose members are aware and engaged in the rapidly expanding movement for climate protection; part of the solution in their homes, workplaces, and communities, and a growing voice for responsible climate policy.

Of all the places on Earth, the Pacific Northwest poised to best demonstrate potential solutions, and how they help build stronger economies and healthier communities. This region has a tradition of renewable energy and efficiency investment, which includes an infrastructure of businesses, institutions, and public agencies that form the nucleus for a clean energy economy. The central feature of this new prosperity is the transition from fossil fuels to clean energy sources and efficient systems.

Much of this work is already under way. Thanks to the efforts of Northwest Energy Coalition and Northwest Energy Efficiency Council, over 2600 average megawatts of electricity has been saved in the last two decades, enough to power all of Idaho on a continuous basis. With strong leadership from the Renewable Northwest Project and the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, renewable energy production and use is expanding rapidly. The Climate Trust and Seattle City light are pioneering market-based approaches to greenhouse gas reduction. Transportation Choices Coalition, Oregon Environmental Council and Tri-Met are developing innovative ways to reduce car trips and Mt Hood Meadows is "Keeping Winter Cool" with renewable energy. And the list goes on and on.

These organizations, not content to rest on their laurels, formed Northwest Climate Connections. This is a project of Climate Solutions, a state leader is practical and profitable solutions to global warming. The Connections project aims connect those solutions and their sponsors into a winning constituency for the policy and economic changes needed in order to stabilize the climate. Climate change may well be this generation's defining challenge. It's clearly more than any one organization can handle. That's why it's so important that those who are committed to solutions connect.

To learn more about Climate Solutions and the Northwest Climate Connections Project, please visit their website: www.climatesolutions.org.

Posted in the September 2004 Earth Page

In Brief: Wildfire Coalition formed in Eastern Washington, No-Shooting Zone Expanded, Northwest Exposure Photo Contest

Wildfire Coalition formed in Eastern Washington
Concerns about wildfire continue to drive management of National Forests in Eastern Washington. The passage of the Healthy Forest Restoration Act has given the green light to the Forest Service to move forward on fuel reduction projects.

The Lands Council's (TLC) work on wildfire education issues has led to a collaborative effort known as the Colville Community Forestry Coalition. TLC Executive Director Mike Petersen sits on the Board of this diverse rural group - along with timber companies, a ski area owner, and fire protection agencies. The Coalition will help establish community wildfire plans which provide opportunities to build cooperation with local government, fire districts, public agencies, and community organizations. Community fire plans identify and prioritize hazardous fuels treatment projects, which make it important for the conservation community to be involved. The Lands Council helped create a template for wildfire planning that is being used throughout Oregon and Washington, contributing to the effort to encourage rural communities to co-exist with the forest around them.

No-shooting Zone Expanded
Firearm use is often overlooked as a form of environmental degradation, but in Sultan Basin, it is a major environmental and safety hazard. Wade Holden, founder of Friends of the Trail, a group that cleans up public lands, has asked for more land to be restricted from gun enthusiasts. "The shooters have been using dumped trash for target practice, creating environmental hazards for nearby Olney Creek, and endangering people in the woods," according to Holden. Department of Natural Resources officials said as much as 80 percent of the logs sold by the state several years ago had bullet holes in them. The Snohomish County Council passed the expanded ban unanimously.

Northwest Exposure Photo Contest
Washington Trails Association (WTA) is hosting its annual photo contest called Northwest Exposure. The contest seeks to exhibit the splendor of Washington's wild areas while providing a forum for both aspiring and experienced nature photographers. This annual outdoor photo contest has four unique categories: People in the Wild, Washington Landscapes, Flora & Fauna, and Offbeat Outdoors. So hit the trail with your camera or gather together those images -- a deer on the trail at Mount Townsend, that amazing sunset from Skyline Divide, or hikers in the Goat Rocks Wilderness. WTA will award a grand prize (which will be pictured on the cover of the January/February 2005 issue of Washington Trails) plus first, second, and third prizes in the four categories. You can submit up to one photo in each of the four categories.

For more information, entry forms, and submission guidelines, call (206) 625-1367 or visit www.wta.org. The submission deadline is Sunday, October 31, 2004.

Posted in the September 2004 Earth Page

Tacoma Power Offers Customers "Green Power" Option

Tacoma Power's EverGreen Options program offers customers the opportunity to support electricity generated by sustainable, renewable power sources that have minimal impact on the earth's natural resources. About 85% of EverGreen Options' power is generated by wind, low-impact hydropower, and a small amount of solar electricity. By making a modest additional payment through their electricity bills, customers will be contributing toward improving the environment.

Tacoma Power's green power - Environmentally Preferred Power (EPP) - is a portfolio of renewable power assembled by the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, and sold through the Bonneville Power Administration to utilities in the Pacific Northwest. EPP is endorsed by environmental groups including Earth Share of Washington members Northwest Energy Coalition and Natural Resources Defense Council.

Green power options are not strictly limited to Tacoma - power companies around Washington offer programs which allow their customers to support the development of renewable energy such as wind and solar. For more information about green power programs in Washington State, including EverGreen Options in Tacoma, please visit the Environmental Protection Agency's "How to Buy Green Power" webpage: www.epa.gov/greenpower/buyguide/wa.htm.

Posted in the May 2004 Earth Page

Environmental Gains Achieved in 2004 Legislative Session

- submitted by Tom Geiger from ESW member Washington Environmental Council

Olympia, WA -- The 2004 Legislative Session was marked by environmental gains and no losses, making a successful year in the state capitol for Washington's environmental community. Progress was made in the areas of toxics reduction, old growth protection, water clean up and stream flow restoration.

"This is the second consecutive year in which bi-partisan support was essential to passing environmental priorities," said Clifford Traisman, state lobbyist for Washington Environmental Council/Washington Conservation Voters. "Lawmakers from both parties increasingly understand that clean air, land and water are important to all Washington citizens."

At the outset of the 2004 Session, the environmental community elevated four Priorities [featured in the February 2004 Earth Page]. Results included the following:

• Toxics: Funding for the state's Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxics (PBTs) program was restored, ensuring that the most harmful chemicals in our society, such as mercury, dioxin and PBDE (the fire retardant polybrominated diphenyl ethers), will ultimately be reduced in our environment.
• Forests: An important study to look at certifying state forests--which would have delayed the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) from increasing logging state forests until the study was completed--was not included in the final capital budget, but a provision was included that requires the DNR to inventory and map old growth in state forests and notify the public before it is logged.
• Water: A bill to restore and protect stream flows (SHB 2396) did not make it through the legislative process, but neither did other water legislation, which would have eliminated the state's law aimed at preventing the hoarding and speculation of the public's water. However, $1 million was included in the supplemental budget to improve stream flows and water management.
• Energy: Although legislation to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy development did not pass the full legislature, the bill did pass two House committees. Fortunately, the legislature did pass a bill requiring new power plants to mitigate 20 percent of their emissions of carbon dioxide, the principle pollutant responsible for global warming (SHB 3141).

Other important environmental bills included oil spill prevention (SSB 6641), electronic recycling (ESHB 2488), and significantly, improved safeguards for stormwater management (ESSB 6415). Governor Locke is expected to sign all of the bills and support the proposed funding.

"This is the first time in memory that the legislature provided all wins and no losses for the environment," said Joan Crooks, WEC Executive Director. "The environmental community intends to continue this record of success in the 2005 Session with a new governor and new legislature."

Posted in the April 2004 Earth Page

The Smell of CO(-2) in the Morning

- submitted by Allison Riese from ESW member EarthCorps, originally published in the Seattle P-I

Carbon dioxide is one of the by-products of coffee roasting.

For environmentally conscious David Schomer, who has run Espresso Vivace on Capitol Hill for 15 years, it's a vexing matter. So to mitigate some of the effects of his coffee roasting, Schomer is donating 2,000 trees - Western red cedar, Western hemlock and Sitka spruce - for planting this week in Interlaken Park.

There are 3,700 acres of publicly owned forests in Seattle, said Pieter Bohen, lands stewardship director for Seattle-based Cascade Land Conservancy, which is working with the Mayor's Office on a project to restore the city's urban forests. Of those, about 85 percent are in rapid decline and 60 percent are covered with tree-killing ivy.

Trees absorb carbon dioxide during photosynthesis and emit oxygen, improving air quality. One acre of mature trees sequesters 16 tons of carbon a year, Bohen said. The 3-year-old trees planted this week will cover about 10 acres of the Capitol Hill park.

It is uncertain how long it will take those trees to absorb the amount of carbon dioxide that is emitted from Espresso Vivace's roaster. But the business is taking a positive step, Bohen said.

"I'm really impressed with David. I think his heart is really in the right place," he said. "If, for instance, all the small coffee businesses in the city alone decided to sequester their carbon, we could probably restore the entire urban forest just on that. That's a remarkable thought."

Schomer, who is donating $10,000 for the trees, and his staff will plant trees along with volunteers from Cascade Land Conservancy and EarthCorps starting Wednesday. He acknowledged being "a little bit hyperaware" of air pollution; he commutes from Fremont to Capitol Hill by bicycle. Interlaken Park is on his route.

"It's going to be really sweet to go by the trees," he said. "It's just going to be great."

Those wishing to patronize Schomer's establishment will find Espresso Vivace at 901 E. Denny Way (at Broadway) in Seattle.

Posted in the April 2004 Earth Page

Renewing Washington's Energy Future

Wind Production Numbers Show Standards are Economic Stimulus

OLYMPIA - The Washington legislature is poised to adopt a policy proven to increase development of renewable energy and energy efficiency, allowing the state to join the ranks of others using the combined purchasing power of their utilities to benefit local and statewide economies.

Last year's wind-farm construction boom demonstrates a strong link between industry growth and states with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS). During 2003, 65 percent of U.S. wind development occurred in states with either an RPS or a renewable energy fund, such as the Energy Trust of Oregon. Wind farms installed throughout the country last year will generate more than $5 million in annual payments to landowners. All four states with the most wind development in 2003 have RPS policies in place.

According to the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), the 1,700 megawatts of wind power developed in the U.S. during 2003 was a near record, surpassed only slightly in 2001. Minnesota's wind development in the last year was nearly 15 times Washington State's modest incremental wind power construction. Nearly all of the 15.6 megawatts of wind developed last year in Washington resulted from expansion of Energy Northwest's Nine Canyon wind farm in Benton County. That's very little new growth, especially in a state blessed with tremendous wind resources - enough to supply close to two-thirds of the state's electricity needs, according to the recent Renewable Energy Atlas of the West (www.energyatlas.org).

Washington legislators are considering numerous bills encouraging increased renewable energy and energy efficiency including elements of RPS policies established in other states, most relying on incentives and flexible compliance to gain utility support. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that, if enacted in Washington, such policies would attract the growing wind industry to the state and stimulate more than $28 million annually in land lease payments, property tax revenues, wages, and economic activity for every 100 megawatts of wind power generation developed over the next 20 years. The bills also would unleash inland communities to harvest clean energy from the 4.3 million tons of biomass produced each year in Eastern Washington. According to a recent Washington State University study, this biomass surplus could produce 3.1 million megawatt-hours of electricity, 40 percent of Eastern Washington's residential load (www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0307021.html).

"Washington's legislature has an important opportunity to build the rural economy and stabilize electric rates through SHB 2333," said Randy Smith of NW Sustainable Energy for Economic Development (SEED). Smith noted the American Farm Bureau Federation's recent endorsement of renewable electric standards - a sign that the national farm community values the development of renewable energy sources to stimulate rural economies.

To learn more about renewable energy in Washington, contact Earth Share of Washington members Climate Solutions and Northwest Energy Coalition.

Posted in the March 2004 Earth Page

2004 Environmental Legislative Priorities - Forests, Streams, Energy and Toxins

Groups stress need to protect current safeguards

OLYMPIA, Wash. - At the start of the 2004 Washington legislature, 14 conservation organizations representing tens of thousands of residents joined together to encourage elected representatives to pass important new measures and to continue safeguards of our health and the environment.

The groups have given highest priority to four issues involving forests, streams, power and toxic pollution, and made "No rollbacks" a special priority for this legislative session.

The four main priorities are:

• Certified stewardship for state-owned forests, including the preservation our remaining old growth.
• Safeguarding water levels in Washington streams for vital fish habitat, water quality, irrigation, power and recreation.
• Fostering more reliable and sustainable energy by encouraging electric utilities to include energy-efficiency savings and reasonable amounts of renewables such as wind, biomass and solar in their mix of power sources.
• Funding to eliminate and clean-up persistent toxic chemicals such as mercury, dioxin and PCBs.

In addition, the state's environmental community will encourage legislators to keep Washington "a national leader on environmental health and stewardship," said Bruce Gryniewski, executive director of Washington Conservation Voters.

Groups backing the priorities are Earth Share of Washington members 1000 Friends of Washington, American Rivers, Audubon WA, Center for Environmental Law and Policy, NW Energy Coalition, People for Puget Sound, Sierra Club, Transportation Choices Coalition, Washington Environmental Council, Washington Toxics Coalition and other Washington environmental groups -- NW Ecosystem Alliance, League of Women Voters, Washington Conservation Voters, and WashPIRG.

Posted in the February 2004 Earth Page

Carbon Dioxide Mitigation in Washington

- submitted by Lisa Noble for ESW member Northwest Energy Coalition

Residents of the Pacific Northwest have long benefited from abundant and relatively cheap hydropower. Currently hydropower provides about 70 percent of Washington's electricity, but cannot be counted upon to satisfy additional future demand. Unfortunately, our remaining energy needs are being met primarily with coal and natural gas, fouling the air we breathe and causing more damage from global warming.

Climate change already is reducing the amount of water available for power generation and other Northwest needs, such as irrigation, recreation and wildlife. Proposed new power plants threaten to emit millions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary global warming pollutant, to Northwestern skies.

In 1997, Oregon became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from new natural gas power plants. Now, after several years of effort by clean-energy advocates, Washington is poised to establish its own standard.

Sadly, the draft rule developed by Washington State's Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) is no better than Oregon's long-outdated standard. Though Governor Gary Locke called for offsetting 20 percent of new CO2 emissions, EFSEC has set the price of mitigating carbon so artificially low that in reality, less than 10 percent of emissions will be offset. "Mitigation" can mean removing an equal amount of CO2 from the atmosphere -- through a tree-growing project, for example. It also can mean funding a renewable-energy project that generates power without producing CO2. Either way, that mitigation costs about $2.75 per ton. EFSEC's draft rule, by comparison, would charge polluters just 87 cents per ton.

When many other states are considering real and significant emission reductions, the EFSEC proposal falls short of curbing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.

EFSEC is accepting comments from the public through the end of November. To learn more about CO2 mitigation or to get involved in public commentary visit: www.nwenergy.org.

Posted in the November 2003 Earth Page

The Harsh Reality of Global Climate Change

In July of 2003, over 700 U.S. climate scientists submitted a letter to the U.S. Senate on global climate change. The letter highlights the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions clearly stating that the longer we wait, the faster we will have to reduce emissions in order to mitigate the effects of climate change.

The letter was delivered in time for the Senate to debate amendments to "The Energy Policy Act of 2003" (S-14), expected to address the issue of climate change/global warming. A copy of the letter follows.

THE STATE OF CLIMATE SCIENCE: JULY 2003 -- A LETTER FROM U.S. SCIENTISTS:

July 29, 2003
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senators First and Daschle:

Two years have elapsed since the publication of the most recent reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Cha